The Omni Group Forums

The Omni Group Forums (http://forums.omnigroup.com/index.php)
-   Applying OmniFocus (http://forums.omnigroup.com/forumdisplay.php?f=51)
-   -   A Case for OmniFocus (http://forums.omnigroup.com/showthread.php?t=11285)

unixfudotnet 2009-02-10 05:36 PM

A Case for OmniFocus
 
I think I now "get" OmniFocus. I wrote about it from people asking me about it.

[url]http://unixfu.net/2009/02/10/a-case-for-omnifocus/[/url]

Do you have anything to add or correct?

SpiralOcean 2009-02-10 06:05 PM

Great article.

One thing about locations:

[QUOTE]So, if you have an errand to get a banana split, you can easily find all ice cream shops close to you from where you happen to be at the time. Life is busy, planning to be at a specific location just isn’t always reliable.[/QUOTE]

Currently, an action can only have one context or location assigned to it. Finding all ice creame shops close to you can be done with the iPhone map application or the Google application, but not with OmniFocus application. You can however, see all the locations close to you of things you have chosen to do.

A feature that wasn't mentioned was the ability to focus on a project so that you are only seeing that project. This can become extremely powerful and most applications do not offer something like this.

I like your closing paragraph about simplicity:
[QUOTE]Simplicity
There is some confusion on the definition of simplicity. It does NOT mean less features so all you can do is walk a straight line, even if you don’t want to.

REAL simplicity is a process that allows you to naturally walk a straight line and NOT get in the way. You are in control, you are the user, you are the boss. OmniFocus realizes this and gives this to you.[/QUOTE]

zts-it 2009-02-10 10:13 PM

[QUOTE=unixfudotnet;55018]I think I now "get" OmniFocus. I wrote about it from people asking me about it.

[url]http://unixfu.net/2009/02/10/a-case-for-omnifocus/[/url]

Do you have anything to add or correct?[/QUOTE]Excellent article/commentary! However, I'd add on this particular point:
[INDENT][I]A native Mac interface (no fancy UI)
This is just a preference for me, I want a Mac application to look like a Mac application. I don’t want a custom colored UI or to emulate a notebook paper sheet.

I never got why people do that. I think it is another example of programmers deciding what is good for me instead of me. One ounce of flexibility is worth ten pounds of UI fanciness.[/I][/INDENT]
What I'd add or modify is the fact that Omni hides its beauty (or fanciness) inside until you get to know the application. Once you get to know the app, the things start looking logically simple and beautiful. Omni GUI is not a fad nor it tends to run for the title of the design of the day (like some apps that provoke one-time WOW and then the questions of usability and functionality keep popping up). There are two Mac software companies that I personally rank the highest for their consistency in producing highly attractive and quality-packed software: Omni and Panic. These rarely (if ever) disappoint.

One thing about OF that you haven't mentioned and that OF's current competition is missing -- underneath its surface OF hides lots of customization of styles (customize colors, fonts, indents, customize subtasks in the same way, customize the display of the left panel, etc.). Now, try to do the same with the competing products that supposedly offer a fancier GUI and you won't get far. Not to mention (as you already said) that some of competition is missing critical stuff such as sub-tasking or parallel and sequential arrangements. Overall, to me it seems that OF is a pro package suitable for biz, education, science, and home, while others are more geared toward a typical home to-do lists.

Anyways, excellent article!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.