Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
This is actually the way the application functions - child rows look at their ancestors and use the earliest due date they can find. Making the interface communicate that more clearly is one of the things on our to-do list...
|
Yes, I knew under the hood some of this was happening (coloring due-soons based on parent due dates, for example). And I'm glad to hear that the interface may become clearer on that. I'd just repeat that the "faded flags" seem to me to offer a good analogy for what it could look like.
But am I right that items do NOT presently look at due dates of items further in their sequence to determine an implicit due date?
EDIT: cross-posted edit; I'll submit the feedback.