Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Forrest
So I'm curious what the reason is why the results need to be in HTML/CSS... rather than, for example, a PDF. The only difference (I can think of) is the ability to copy or edit the code.
|
Well, .webarchives do only work with Webkit browsers. PDFs don't give you the possibility to interact with the page, e.g. follow links (although this would be possible, but I doubt it's implemented that way (never tried)).
If a html/css version was possible for any page you viewed, you could open your archives in any browser whatsoever.
I guess that's what's behind that request.