View Single Post
Thanks for your elaborate replies!

Originally Posted by Toadling View Post
But I wonder if displaying items "bottom-up" instead of "top-down" might be confusing, especially for new users.
I agree that it might be confusing for a certain group of users. But will it be worth implementing as a preference?

Originally Posted by Greg Jones View Post
I want every child level to be a dependent, sub-set of the parent level.
This seems to be the rule of thumb to follow when setting up contexts in the current 'top-down' implementation. But after some experimentation I find it hard to come up with clear and satisfying structure, because:

1. Truly dependable sub-contexts are hard to define
2. You want to break up a context as less as possible