The users that are sick of hearing complaints need to add one items to their OmniFocus - "Learn to read." Follow that up with "Open eyes and look around"
When you pay a relatively high price of $80, you expect that the developers will be honorable and provide the iPhone application at a less greedy price. Omni developers are the not the only ones that need money. If excellent GTD apps like Things (
http://culturedcode.com/things/) can cost $50 for both desktop and iPhone apps, then how come Omni can charge twice as much?
For those feeling intelligent by saying that you don't need to subsidize iPhone users, how come you are paying four times as much as Ghost Action (
http://ghostparksoftware.com/) for the exact functionality PLUS synchronization (not with iphone yet, but with other PDAs and .mac)?
Its true that the market will decide what's a "fair price" but I think I'll put my weight behind Things because not only does it work much better but has a much cleaner, simpler UI. Keep feeling happy about the $100 that Omni deserves, maybe even donate them some. Its asinine not to support another company with a equal or arguably better software for $50, including their iphone application.
I was testing this software for over 2000 Mac users (with many of them using iPhones). Guess who we will approach for an enterprise license? At that scale, I'm paying half with Things compared to "they need bread on the table" Omni developers. Honestly, I'm disappointed because Omni has always been fair on pricing.