[henri]

Weird. First, I was not able to reproduce the problem with a new file. But then, it fixed itself in the problem file! Apologies for the false alarm.

However, I'm not happy with the new behavior.

In OO3, if I sorted by priorities (1, 2, 3), the 1's went to the top, and the rows with empty cells in that column went after the 3's. In OO4, the empty cells (perhaps interpreted as 0) go to the top and priorities 1-3 go to the end. That makes this really inconvenient, as I presumably would need to put a 4 in the dozens and dozens of rows that have an empty cell if I want to get 1, 2, 3 to the top.

Or am I missing something?

Thanks.

--Henri