Quote:
1) added a context called "none" (although this could equally be called "computer")
|
I too am one of those knowledge workers. But although I am at my computer all day, I am in different contexts all the time. For example, I use DevonThink to help manage my data, and each of my DT databases deals with a specific project. So I have a unique context assigned to each of those projects. I also have a single action list entitled "Ideas." When I'm in that list I'll quickly make a number of different entries at one time, assigning the appropriate context to each as I go along. Then, later, when I am in one of those databases (e.g. DT:XProject) I will look at its context in OF and enter those ideas appropriate to that dbase.
Another example: Say that there are office supplies that I need to order. I will have entered them in my OF shopping list in the last few weeks or so using my "Online:Staples" context. Then, when it's time to order those supplies, I just go to that context and quickly run down the list.
Just because we may be physically at a computer all day, doesn't mean that we are not "moving" in and out of different contexts as we do our work. I think we limit how we think about contexts by defining them only as different physical locations rather than also virtual ones. And since, as others have said, the use of contexts in OF is one of its most powerful features, it pays off in the long run to be able to use them in an efficient and effective manner. With this in mind, you may want to take another look at your context set-up so that you don't have so many "None" or "Computer" contexts, but ones more specific to applications or areas that you frequent in your computer. (By the way, I had to fiddle with mine over a few months until I finally settled on those that work best for me.)
Regards,
John