I am thinking about removing my someday/future lists from my main OF database to help make it smaller (and hopefully help keep me more focused and organized).
I started moving them to a text/taskpaper file, but the "Export to Plain Text (Taskpaper)" option leaves a lot to be desired (there is a lot of clean up afterwards, especially with not having line breaks between a tasks notes and the next task!). I have decided against going this route.
My current idea is moving them all into another OF database which I can open up periodically (with a reminder from my active OF database, of course). What I would like to know is what is the difference between a ".ofocus-archive" and ".ofocus-backup" file? Both can be opened concurrently with the main database and I can drag items back and forth between the two, which is what I'd be doing with my someday/future items. Is one preferred over the other as far as making it a usable database file?
Or could I just make another ".ofocus" file (not backup or archive) with a different name and do the same thing? Is this a bad thing to do?
Has anyone else tried this? How does it work from both an organizational and a technological point of view?
Thanks for any insights,
Eric
I started moving them to a text/taskpaper file, but the "Export to Plain Text (Taskpaper)" option leaves a lot to be desired (there is a lot of clean up afterwards, especially with not having line breaks between a tasks notes and the next task!). I have decided against going this route.
My current idea is moving them all into another OF database which I can open up periodically (with a reminder from my active OF database, of course). What I would like to know is what is the difference between a ".ofocus-archive" and ".ofocus-backup" file? Both can be opened concurrently with the main database and I can drag items back and forth between the two, which is what I'd be doing with my someday/future items. Is one preferred over the other as far as making it a usable database file?
Or could I just make another ".ofocus" file (not backup or archive) with a different name and do the same thing? Is this a bad thing to do?
Has anyone else tried this? How does it work from both an organizational and a technological point of view?
Thanks for any insights,
Eric