Application wide or per action?
These forums are now read-only. Please visit our new forums to participate in discussion. A new account will be required to post in the new forums. For more info on the switch, see this post. Thank you!
|
|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Help... Sequential/Parallel issue | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Member
2009-01-28, 05:26 PM
Application wide or per action?
Post 11
|
Member
2009-02-03, 12:45 PM
Avrum68: I would give context a try while you are here, even though the next release makes them optional. I fought it too. My resoning was I didn't need it. 95% of what I do is in my home office so most of the time I have all of the traditional contexts at my disposal, phone, online, email... etc... I use it more for what do I feel like or should I be doing right now. For example I know that the best time for me to write is early morning. So in the mornings I only focus on the "write" context.
Again in 1.6 it becomes less of an issue but even with that I'd give it a try, you might like it. George
Post 12
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sequential vs. Parallel | villageboy | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 2 | 2008-02-13 06:46 AM |
Sequential Vs. Parallel Projects | KPC | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 1 | 2008-01-10 09:21 AM |
Parallel v sequential issue, keyboard commands | lastgasp | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 7 | 2007-09-20 07:22 AM |
Parallel and sequential subprojects | javito | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 16 | 2007-05-29 03:35 PM |
Parallel or sequential by default? | michelle | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 16 | 2007-05-02 12:14 PM |