I like the idea of having parallel or sequential tasks. But is this only configurable for the project? I have projects that have both, sequential and parallel tasks. Can I do this in OmniFocus?
These forums are now read-only. Please visit our new forums to participate in discussion. A new account will be required to post in the new forums. For more info on the switch, see this post. Thank you!
|
|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Parallel or not parallel | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Member
2007-12-17, 02:32 PM
I like the idea of having parallel or sequential tasks. But is this only configurable for the project? I have projects that have both, sequential and parallel tasks. Can I do this in OmniFocus?
Post 1
|
This is where you want to create action groups
Create an action that appropriately would label a set of actions. Create another action below this and then indent it by hitting CMD-] You can now set the parallel vs sequential for this group of actions (your group is only one, but you can now add others. -P
Post 2
|
Member
2007-12-25, 10:51 AM
Quote:
It's a sequential project and the first action item is a parallel action list to purchase several items. Only the first item is showing as a next action. Shouldn't all items in a parallel action list (or project) show as next actions?
Post 3
|
Member
2007-12-25, 12:07 PM
My impression has been that in GTD there is always a single next action, even if the project is parallel. Maybe think of it as the next, most likely or most important action, even though any number of actions could be performed instead or at the same time. I guess that's why OF shows the top-most action in purple in a parallel project.
I think the main difference between a sequential and parallel project in OF is that the remaining actions in a parallel project are not blocked (i.e. they're displayed in black rather than grayed-out text).
Post 4
|
Member
2007-12-25, 01:28 PM
Quote:
I tried creating a single action list and dragging it to the project, but it changed to a parallel action group rather than what I hoped would be a single action group where all the items would be next actions. Hopefully this will be added at some point. It seems they're awfully close to this already. FYI, The Project name is "Learn Portuguese", a sequential project. The first item is "Purchases" which has several items in a couple of different contexts. If I'm "Online" in that context I want the entire list to show. If I'm running "Errands" I want to know the entire list of items I can buy while I'm in that mode.
Post 5
|
Member
2007-12-25, 01:41 PM
Quote:
This way, people adhering to strict GTD can filter for next actions and see at most one per project, but others can filter for available actions to see everything that can now be done, taking into account the parallel-vs-sequential setting on a project or action group.
Post 6
|
Member
2007-12-25, 04:08 PM
That's very helpful. Thanks, davisre.
How about an explanation of why all items in a Single Action List are considered "available" and "next"? My take is that they're independent actions that work toward different goals. They're almost like mini projects. Since there's no sequence or dependancy between them, they all show up as both "available" and "next". Is that right?
Post 7
|
Member
2007-12-25, 10:27 PM
Quote:
But when I create a new Single Action list and try to move it to my project it transforms to a parallel project and now only shows the first item as a next action.
Post 8
|
Member
2007-12-27, 06:24 AM
Single action lists are a second-level item, below folders, but on the same level with projects. You can't put them inside projects.
Post 9
|
Toadling: Yes, they're basically actions you need to do that don't necessarily move you towards any goal, or fit into any ongoing area of responsibility. For example, you might plan to pick up your grandma on the way to Christmas dinner, but perhaps you don't have a whole "Christmas dinner" project. It's just a one-time random thing you need to do. Since it's got no connection to your other single actions ("buy new cell phone battery" and "stop by Joe's to pick up forgotten hat"), they're all equally "available" and "next"
Post 10
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sequential and parallel tasks | Cortig | OmniFocus 2 for Mac (Private Test) | 8 | 2013-04-26 06:16 PM |
Why are parallel project actions blue, but parallel action group actions are black? | zdlo | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 2 | 2012-05-12 09:06 PM |
Parallel lines | schneck | OmniGraffle General | 2 | 2009-11-25 05:49 AM |
Sequential vs. Parallel | villageboy | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 2 | 2008-02-13 06:46 AM |
Sequential Vs. Parallel Projects | KPC | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 1 | 2008-01-10 09:21 AM |