The Omni Group
These forums are now read-only. Please visit our new forums to participate in discussion. A new account will be required to post in the new forums. For more info on the switch, see this post. Thank you!

Go Back   The Omni Group Forums > OmniFocus > Applying OmniFocus
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
Why David Allen doesn't "get" GTD Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Made you look, didn't I?

Actually, I'm serious. David Allen is different than most of us, and that difference explains a lot of the disconnect between strict, pure David Allen GTD and those of us so much in need of it.

Let me explain.

I've seen a lot of discussion in the OF forum lamenting the fact that GTD ignores Priorities. To state it simply, DA believes you should plan in Projects, but work from Contexts. Therefore, when you're at an airport with 20 minutes on your hands and a cellphone in your pocket, you look at your "Calls" context and that's what you do.

Makes sense as far as it goes, The problem is, it doesn't go far enough to cover "the rest of us."

Here's what makes DA different than me and (statistically) you: DA is The Boss.

DA can look at any given Context list and decide what's important at that moment for where he is and what tools are at hand. I can't. My boss decides what's important - and when he tells me, I better have a way of marking those actions accordingly.

In other words, DA and I come to GTD from opposite directions. DA makes a call because he's near a phone. I am near a phone because my boss says I need to make a call.

And that, my fellow wage-slaves, is a critical difference indeed.

The reality is simple: if someone else is constantly pushing things onto your plate, you need to know which things are steak, which things are veggies, and which things are garnish. And that's the pusher's call, not yours. You're the pushee.

Fortunately, the solution in OF is just as simple. Here's what I do:

I start every action assigned to me with a number (1, 2, or 3) followed by a symbol (I use the equal sign). Here are a few examples:

1= Send flowers to Boss's mother from him (Mother's Day is tomorrow).
3= Sched appt to have tires rotated on Boss's car.
1= Buy Boss's wife a great anniversary gift from him (anniversary was yesterday).
2= Tell Jenkins he's being transferred to Cleveland (the Boss hates him).
3= Buy Jenkins a bus ticket.
2= Begin training your replacement if you don't get high priority items done.

So now, all I have to do (in either Projects or Context mode) is type "1=" into the search field, and only the most important items (in my Boss's humble opinion) appear. I can quickly see that I have assigned each action an appropriate start/due date, moved it to the right place (if it belongs to a Project), given it the right Context, and so on.

Most importantly, I can be sure that of the 200 actions currently stuck in my OF craw, I can instantly see the relative importance of each action, and make sure I don't do a 2 until I've finished all the 1's, no matter where I am or what tools are handy.

That's how I keep myself in the context of "employed." <g>

PS: the reason I don't use the Flag for critical items is that I flag actions that I'm waiting for. This let's me keep "1= Call Dave to schedule lunch meeting with Boss this Fri" in the "Phone" context, and to even check it as "Done," (after all, I made the call), yet still see that I'm waiting for Dave to call me back and confirm that he got the voice mail I left for him and that he'll be at the meeting.
 
If your boss says you _need_ to make a call, why not just make the call instead of putting it inside of OF with the top priority?

I don't use OF as the extreme arbiter of ALL actions. Some things are TIMED actions (e.g. conference calls, customer calls, meetings, etc.) which I put in a calendar and do at an exact time. Then I typically use dates to help me prioritize other actions. And I don't have to have a priority number sitting in front of me when confronted with 3 tasks... I do the most important ones first. When I look at the 3 actions, I can decide that then... the fact that I made the priority decision hours or days previously and marked them as such is irrelevant.

Yes, there are other threads saying OF needs priorities (one just got hit by a Chinese spammer... wanna buy something?). And for some it's helpful. But you can also work around it in various ways.
 
CatOne:

If my boss called and told me to make a call, then hung up, I'd make the call as soon as I had a dial tone. But my boss is not stingy when it comes to handing out tasks.

When he calls me, it's never with a single action -- it's with several simultaneous assignments, most of which he probably thinks are Actions but which are usually each mini-Projects with several steps required to make them happen.

If I ever had a day when I was confronted with only 3 tasks, I'd feel like Jimmy Stewart at the end of "It's A Wonderful Life."

Maybe I could train my boss to adopt a "one call, one task" policy with me, but until I win a lottery, I don't think I'll put it to the test. <g>
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiglebox View Post
The problem is, it doesn't go far enough to cover "the rest of us."

Here's what makes DA different than me and (statistically) you: DA is The Boss.

DA can look at any given Context list and decide what's important at that moment for where he is and what tools are at hand. I can't. My boss decides what's important - and when he tells me, I better have a way of marking those actions accordingly.
I'm not sure I agree. In my experience, most "knowledge workers" have at least some discretion in choosing what to work on at any given moment, as long as the deadline is met. This certainly holds true for me and the vast majority of my coworkers. But every situation is different, so let's assume your assertion is true.

I use flags for marking items as important and give items due dates if they're urgent. This has worked extremely well for me. I think the distinction between importance and urgency is significant, so I like to view them in separate lists.

In addition to this, I've been experimenting with a "dynamic" perspective that focuses on the projects I'm currently working on. It changes frequently, sometimes multiple times in a day. I select the projects that are currently hot, hit the focus button, and update the perspective snapshot. This gives me a narrow list of just the items I want to work on right now.

-Dennis
 
My gears are turning… I've found that it's hard to implement OF. Not because OF is not good, but because no matter how good it is, if I haven't trained myself to use it the way it was designed, then it won't work for me. I guess OF is not just a program that will do everything for you; it's a program that will help train you to live your life the GTD way.

Thanks for the distinction between importance and urgency. I have been trying to wrap my mind around how to prioritize tasks for some time now. That's how I got to this thread. I have a muddled distinction between what a project is and what a single action item is. I think the line can be grey at times. I've also in the past had a muddled distinction between planning time and context time (in the beginning I actually worked for several months solely from the project view, not remembering to work from the context view!)

I've evolved to having 26 contexts (including sub-contexts). Is that normal? I find I need them so I don't spend precious time sifting through tasks when I should be getting them done.

But then again, no matter what context I'm in, if something's urgent, I better get in that context quick if I want to get it done on time! So that brings me back to training my own mind to use this tool. I need to always check my urgent tasks, review them daily, and then quickly focus on the context I'm in and crank it out.

Yes, Omnifocus isn't perfect. There are some random things I wish it did, but at this point I've realized a lot of my headaches were a result of applying GTD incorrectly, and not building enough complexity into OmniFocus. OF can handle complexity (while in some ways, my mind can't!) but I still have to change my habits to make it work. It's not going to conform to the way I do things. I'm going to have to conform to it.

That brings me to the topic of routine. One thing I have found OF will not do for me well is help me implement a routine. I see routine as a separate aspect of life that needs organizing in some other way. I use a mindmap, with routine daily and weekly items organized spatially. I know you can repeat tasks in OF, but to me that just adds clutter to the program and requires more organization on my part. But maybe I could re-think that...

Routine helps me because it minimizes multi-tasking, which is the bane of my creativity and productivity. Speaking of which, planning and doing should be two separate activities. I'm trying to implement that habit religiously, because I find a lot of time is wasted if I try to do while planning. The two just don't mix—it's like drinking and driving.

If you've read this far, thanks. It's been good to verbalize this to concretize it within my own head. This might be good for newbies to read; I'm repeating stuff that is probably common knowledge in the GTD world, but which may not be so obvious to the newly initiated.

But, yeah, priorities have been a headache for me. I am still trying to figure the priority thing out... the gears are turning.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by synth01 View Post
But, yeah, priorities have been a headache for me. I am still trying to figure the priority thing out... the gears are turning.
Perhaps this will help: http://www.43folders.com/2009/04/28/priorities

For a good long while, I've been stuck on this "priority" issue and had an epiphany when I read his post about this. So, now I feel a bit free to sidestep this issue.
 
26 contexts ? is that including sub-contexts [I hope ?]

try putting the top [at most 7 ] contexts of your life as headers and then put the lesser ones under each of the 7 ..

with this you'll be able to see everything under the main context and then focus on the sub contexts as needed ..

just a suggestion : )
 
Quote:
26 contexts ? is that including sub-contexts [I hope ?]
I have 9 header contexts. I do need to shuffle them around, I think, maybe. I'll look at it
 
There are a couple of alternate ways you could deal with this without resorting to the numbering scheme you've described:

1) Why not just create a context entitled "Boss Assigned" or something similar? Mark all of your boss requested actions with that context and a due date. Then, when you are in context view you will readily see how many "Boss Assigned" tasks you have, and deal with them accordingly. And if you want to get even more precise, you could also create sub-contexts under the "Boss Assigned" context (phone, email, etc.).

2) Create a sub-folder in your "Work" folder (assuming you have one, of course) in your projects list, and title it "Boss Assigned." Then put all of your boss assigned projects into that folder.
 
That right there is a great tip, daiglebox. Funny how, when an interface doesn't spoon-feed functionality, tricks like that can be rather elusive...

I'll definitely be trying that out for a few suitable projects...

I do a little patch like that for knowing if an action has a note in OF for iPhone: I add a > to the file name.

More for easy searching, and for keeping names short for display on iPhone, my work folders all start with a bullet: • - there's a bullet in our logo... and my "life" folders start with a tlide: ~ . (Just one level deep, since once I've drilled down, I'm already where I need to be, so there's no great need for either category name...)

Anyway, great tip, thanks!
 
 




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTD's David Allen new OF Setup guide neilp OmniFocus Extras 4 2012-11-12 07:25 AM
David Allen Endorsement - strong! Fireproof OmniFocus for iPhone 0 2010-08-27 05:32 AM
David Allen on The Hot List invictus26 Applying OmniFocus 2 2010-06-06 09:27 PM
partnering with David Allen? steve OmniFocus 1 for Mac 1 2009-02-12 06:42 PM
Excellent Podcast with David Allen kioneo OmniFocus 1 for Mac 3 2007-08-30 10:54 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.