Is it possible to assign multiple (more than 1) context groups for each action in a project?
These forums are now read-only. Please visit our new forums to participate in discussion. A new account will be required to post in the new forums. For more info on the switch, see this post. Thank you!
|
|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Multiple contexts per action? | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
Member
2007-11-21, 08:19 PM
Is it possible to assign multiple (more than 1) context groups for each action in a project?
Post 1
|
Member
2007-11-21, 08:57 PM
Post 2
|
Member
2007-11-22, 10:21 AM
The concept of contexts doesn't allow for this - at least in the GTD process. A context is the single place or resource necessary for you to do a task. So, for example, the context for phone calls is my phone. I cannot do those tasks if I don't have that resource.
The idea behind contexts is this: All of our to-do lists are too long for us to effectively sort on the fly constantly. But many of the things on our to-do lists simply can't be done right now because of where we are or what resources we have available. Internet research cannot be done unless I have internet access. Errands cannot be done unless I'm out and about town. Therefore, contexts adds a level of filtering that allows us to instantly rule out every task that we cannot do in the moment because of where we are. To have multiple contexts would muddy this filtering.
Post 3
|
Member
2007-11-22, 11:15 AM
Sure, but there are “sub-contexts”, like sub-folders within the folder, which allow some flexibility. I must say I was concerned at this limitation, and saw it as about the only remaining disadvantage of OF compared with Life Balance, but sub-contexts allayed this a bit. That said, Hermitcrab’s explanation sounds a bit doctrinaire to a non-GTD accolyte. I can think of many situations in which it would help greatly to be able to include tasks in more than one context, on the same principle as smart folders.
Post 4
|
Guest
2007-11-22, 02:32 PM
Multiple contexts would be extremely helpful for dealing with time, for example if you regularly need to phone people in other time zones. The typical context of 'phone' is only partially helpful; best would be a combination like 'phone+atlantic', 'phone+gmt'.
A subcontext (e.g. 'phone:atlantic') is also only a partial solution. You might also need to IM people in other timezones as well, and shouldn't need to enter a duplicate set of time-related subcontexts. I can also think of other time contexts like 'business hours', 'evening', and 'weekend' which I'd like to add as a second context to many of my tasks. Come to think of it, time context is such an important factor (neglected in GTD?) that it deserves special handling. One's regular timezone could be added as a default time context to every new task, and you could fine-tune as needed (maybe add 'business hours', or 'weekend'). OF could easily make these active/inactive depending on the time of day. When traveling, you could tell OF your current timezone and active time contexts would adjust accordingly. For example, if your regular timezone was Pacific but you're currently in GMT, a task with 'Phone+Pacific+Business Hours' wouldn't be relevant if it's 9am on a Monday, but would be at 11pm on a Friday. As I think more about this, such functionality would add a level of sophistication to OF that is lacking (as far as I know) in every other GTD app. It would really put it in another category altogether.
Post 5
|
Member
2007-11-22, 05:29 PM
Quote:
However, I wonder if the OP was thinking in terms of context1 OR context2? Here's a perfect example- I need to "Talk to Frank about new contract" which I could do in person (ideal) while in the "Office" or on the "Phone" (if needed). That way, if I'm NOT in the office, but the deadline for talking to Frank is approaching I can see instantly in my Phone context I might need to make that call. And this allows me to rely on the filtering without worry (lose focus) about actions assigned to other contexts that I MIGHT do now. Now, I don't want a context "Frank" because too many contexts (IMO) is the enemy of good GTD. I can see value in the multiple context approach...
Post 6
|
Quote:
I don't do this for casual contacts, mind you, but only for people with whom I have some sort of relationship that involves regular contact: co-workers, family, and so on. And I create them all as subcontexts of the context People so that they don't have to clutter up the rest of my context lists. I make no claims that this approach is right for everyone, but I find it works well for me in my current situation. (It definitely works better than scattering all of my Frank actions across multiple contexts and then somehow trying to find them all without finding everything else I need to say to everyone else once I do get a chance to talk with him.)
Post 7
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why OmniFocus v1 didn't support multiple contexts per action | Brian | Applying OmniFocus | 89 | 2014-03-09 11:18 AM |
One action, multiple contexts | dp1 | Applying OmniFocus | 23 | 2010-07-03 05:09 AM |
multiple contexts and multiple projects | mind full of water | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 7 | 2008-06-23 09:31 AM |
Multiple Activites for Multiple Contexts | Journey | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 12 | 2007-12-27 01:03 AM |
Multiple contexts? | Roger Barre | OmniFocus 1 for Mac | 4 | 2007-11-26 03:46 PM |