[forum member]

Ditto.

*sigh* This message has been artificially lengthened in order to avoid the dreaded error: "The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters."

[mcoad]

Here’s my vote for Hazel compatibility. Hazel is a great complement to the OS, and highly regarded. Omni’s very own Ethan even has a lengthy screencast on his Kinkless site on it, and provides a set of rules for its use. So it seems anomalous indeed that if Safari, Camino, Firefox and Flock are compatible with it, OW isn’t.

[halbtuerke]

Hopefully we 3 are not the only ones who want this feature.

[Terry]

Originally Posted by halbtuerke

Hopefully we 3 are not the only ones who want this feature.

You're not the only 3. I use Hazel as well and want OW to have compatibility.

[globetrotterdk]

I am a Hazel user as well and would like to see support.

[Schlaefer]

I really would like to see Hazel "support" too.

[Christian Roth]

Originally Posted by Schlaefer

I really would like to see Hazel "support" too.

Well, for me, it looks like Hazel works in 5.7 as far as the moving goes.

The problem I have is with OW's dowload manager: Once Hazel moves the file, OW can no longer reveal it, saying that the file has been moved after download.

I thought that Mac OS X had a concept of file aliases, which allowed retrieving the location of a specific file even if it has been moved in the meantime (within the same volume). Is this functionality still present in Mac OS X? If so, would it be possible to have OW use Aliases for storing the downloaded items, so that even after it getting moved by Hazel, OW would be able to reveal (or open) it?

-Christian